Who would have thought?

March 10, 2009

From US intelligence chief Dennis Blair:

“We assess convincing the Iranian leadership to forgo the eventual development of nuclear weapons will be difficult given the linkage many within the leadership see between nuclear weapons and Iran’s key national security and foreign policy objectives, and given Iran’s considerable effort from at least the late 1980s to 2003 to develop such weapons,” he said.

via ‘Difficult’ to halt Iran nuclear drive: US – Yahoo! News UK.

Fortunately, Iran is a “tiny country” that is highly susceptible to the charm of direct talks “without precondition.”



March 4, 2009

Alan Keyes on Barack Obama

February 22, 2009

Obama’s Moral Outrage

December 11, 2008

Have I missed something?  Today in The Guardian there appeared an article titled “Obama calls on governor in Senate seat scandal to quit.”  Really?  This is the supporting statement.

“Under the current circumstances, it is difficult for the governor to effectively do his job and serve the people of Illinois,” Obama’s spokesman, Robert Gibbs, said in a statement.

It was the most expansive statement to date from Obama on the scandal…

How scathing!  Obama seems all most out-of-control outraged!  “Difficult for the governor to effectively do his job”?  Sir, you have cut the governor to the quick with this condemnation.

So where exactly is the call to resign?

If you don’t have the facts, you argue the law

December 3, 2008

Since when has the natural-born citizen requirement of Article II of the Constitution been the object of such scorn?  Well, at least since around the time Barack Obama won his bid for the Senate.  But why?

An associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then-Sen. Barack Obama has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural-born” citizen, calling the requirement “stupid” and affirming it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.

The paper was written in 2006, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate, by Sarah Herlihy. She is listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis, and a partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cites his membership on the finance committees for both U.S. Sens. Obama and Richard Durbin on the corporate website.

A Dangerous Convergence

December 3, 2008

Obama’s apparent selection of Daniel Kurtzer as Mideast Envoy (note: envoy reports to President vs. Sec State) does not bode well for Israel.

Kurtzer, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel, long has been seen in Jerusalem as one of the Jewish state’s greatest foes in Washington. He has been identified by Jewish and Israeli leaders, including prime ministers, as biased against Israel and is notorious for urging extreme concessions from the Jewish state.

How is this to be interpreted in light of Obama’s stated intention to not allow a nuclear Iran?  Two parties urgently need to make sense of it: Iran and Israel.  Will Iran see this as a welcome recession of US support for Israel?  Will Israel see this as further impetus to take preemptive action before Bush leaves?  Not much time before this comes to a head.

Iran poses the greatest foreign policy challenge to Barack Obama, the President-elect, with Tehran on course to produce a nuclear bomb in the first year of an Obama administration, a coalition of top think-tanks gave warning yesterday.

UPDATE: Can’t say that these are reactions specifically to Obama’s nonverbal communications, but they are relevant nevertheless.

From Israel:

The IDF is drawing up options for a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities that do not include coordination with the United States, The Jerusalem Post has learned.

From Iran:

“We think that regional and international developments and the complicated situation faced by Israel itself will not allow it to launch military strikes against other countries,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi told reporters in Teheran, according to the Press TV Web site.